Data Labs I
Ten months of Shippr, our AI-native studio, at work. Every task starts from a real person's need. The Phazur Labs engineering team writes the brief, approves the plan and steers the work, while agents build, test and ship it. This is the record of that human-centered loop, and what it's worth.
How Shippr was built. The system behind the studio was engineered by the Phazur Labs team, then tuned on real work.
Loading the corpus summary…
What we have
The full record of the task loop: the Phazur Labs team's briefs and decisions, agent logs from every coding tool, and the code those tasks produced.
Agent logs by tool
Actions are tool calls, shell commands and edits. Diffs are full file patches.
| Tool | Units | Actions |
|---|
Claude Code tool calls
What the agent did, by tool.
Repos with test suites
Tests turn finished tasks into graded tasks, the format buyers pay most for.
What it's worth
Graded tasks built from owned repos are worth far more than raw logs. Ranges come from published per-task, per-token and per-codebase prices.
Products
One-time values share one scale. Recurring and hourly lines are listed as stated.
| Product | Range | Status |
|---|
Session corpus valuation
Three approaches, weighted.
| Approach | Weight | Range |
|---|
SONAR score
Gulp Data's five factors, each out of 5.
What has to clear first
No number in this report is final until every gate below is done.
Provider terms are the hard limit. Shippr's tasks ran on Claude Code, Codex and Cursor, and Anthropic and OpenAI forbid training on their models' outputs without written permission. Until that's granted, only the human side sells: the Phazur Labs engineering team's briefs, approvals and decisions, plus owned code, tests and lessons.
Gates
Work top to bottom. Each one is tracked in the DataLabs I legal folder.
Who buys
Task and environment buyers pay the most and fit graded tasks. Marketplaces suit the human-only corpus.